DQRID : D961120.1
Start DateStart TimeEnd DateEnd Time Data Quality Metric
08/01/1996000008/31/19962359Does not affect quality
more
Subject:
SGP/MWR/B1/B4/B5/B6/C1 - Thermal Stabilization Adjustment
DataStreams:sgpmwrlosB4.a1, sgp5mwravgB4.c1, sgpmwrlosB5.a1, sgp5mwravgB6.c1, sgp5mwravgB5.c1,
sgpmwrlosC1.b1, sgpmwrlosB1.a0, sgpmwrlosB6.a1, sgpmwrlosB1.a1, sgp1mwravgC1.c1,
sgpmwrlosB6.a0, sgp5mwravgC1.c1, sgpmwrlosC1.a1, sgpmwrlosB4.a0, sgpmwrlosB5.a0, sgp5mwravgB1.c1
Description:
In order to correct a thermal stabilization problem identified earlier
I adjusted the thermal set point of the microwave radiometers at the
SGP upward from 48-50 deg C to 55 deg C in early August 1996 according
to the schedule given below.

B6    5 August 1996
C1    6 August 1996
B1    7 August 1996
B5    8 August 1996

Subsequent to making this adjustment the MWRs were put in TIP mode to
check on whether the change in set point temperature affected their
calibration.  Because clear sky conditions were quite intermittent, it
is difficult to determine whether the substantial variability in the
tip data were attributable to the change in thermal set point.  The
instrument calibration was not altered in August.

Tip data were again collected with these instruments in September prior
to the beginning and at the close of the Water Vapor IOP.  For example,
the calibration of the instrument at the central facility (S/N 10)
derived from the September data was essentially the same as that
derived from calibration data acquired in February 1996.  Although this
would lead one to believe that altering the thermal set point did not
affect the instrument calibration, it may be that some transient effect
was induced.

In comparing soundings launched from the central facility with the
microwave radiometer there, I noticed that those sondes calibrated in
June 1996 consistently reported lower integrated water vapor than the
radiometer in July and September (during the IOP) but were in better
agreement with the radiometer for the two weeks period immediately
after the set point was adjusted.  I suspect that adjusting the thermal
set point may have temporarily increased the radiometer gain
(kelvins/volt) thereby lowering the measured brightness temperature and
the retrieved integrated water vapor.

It is not clear why a temporary change in gain should occur or even
whether it did.  But users of the data should be aware that the data
from the microwave radiometers at the SGP may be anomalous during
August 1996.
Suggestions: 
Measurements:sgpmwrlosC1.a1:
  • tbsky23
  • vap
  • liq
  • tbsky31
more
sgpmwrlosC1.b1:
  • tbsky31
  • tbsky23
  • vap
  • liq
more
sgpmwrlosB4.a1:
  • 31tbsky
  • 23tbsky
  • vap
  • liq
more
sgp5mwravgC1.c1:
  • liq
  • vap
  • 31tbsky
  • 23tbsky
more
sgp5mwravgB5.c1:
  • 23tbsky
  • 31tbsky
  • vap
  • liq
more
sgp5mwravgB4.c1:
  • 31tbsky
  • liq
  • 23tbsky
  • vap
more
sgp5mwravgB6.c1:
  • 23tbsky
  • 31tbsky
  • liq
  • vap
more
sgp1mwravgC1.c1:
  • 23tbsky
  • 31tbsky
  • vap
  • liq
more
sgp5mwravgB1.c1:
  • 31tbsky
  • 23tbsky
  • vap
  • liq
more
sgpmwrlosB6.a0:
  • 23tbsky
  • 31tbsky
  • liq
  • vap
more
sgpmwrlosB1.a1:
  • 31tbsky
  • 23tbsky
  • vap
  • liq
more
sgpmwrlosB1.a0:
  • 31tbsky
  • 23tbsky
  • liq
  • vap
more
sgpmwrlosB5.a1:
  • liq
  • 23tbsky
  • 31tbsky
  • vap
more
sgpmwrlosB4.a0:
  • liq
  • vap
  • 31tbsky
  • 23tbsky
more
sgpmwrlosB6.a1:
  • liq
  • vap
  • 31tbsky
  • 23tbsky
more
sgpmwrlosB5.a0:
  • liq
  • 23tbsky
  • 31tbsky
  • vap
more

Close this window